A fall from scaffolding, a machinery injury, or years of physical work that leaves you with a serious back condition can mean medical treatment, lost income, and uncertainty about what comes next.
Workers’ compensation may provide medical benefits and a portion of your lost wages, but it does not cover every loss caused by an injury.
In some cases, an injured construction worker can also pursue a separate civil claim against a third party whose negligence contributed to the accident. That claim may provide compensation that workers’ compensation does not, including damages for pain and suffering and lost earning capacity.
Easton & Easton has more than 100 years of combined family experience representing injured people in Southern California. If you were hurt on a construction site, reach out to our team today. A consultation can help identify whether a third-party claim may be available in addition to your workers’ compensation benefits.
Key Takeaways
- Workers’ compensation and a third-party civil claim are separate legal matters. An injured construction worker may be able to pursue both.
- California’s Privette doctrine can protect a general contractor or other hirer from liability for a contractor’s work, but important exceptions may apply.
- A third-party construction accident settlement can include damages such as pain and suffering and lost earning capacity that workers’ compensation does not provide.
- Workers’ compensation and third-party claims have different deadlines and procedural requirements, so acting promptly matters.
- California’s comparative negligence rules may allow an injured worker to recover even when the worker shares some responsibility for the accident.
How Workers’ Compensation and a Construction Accident Settlement Work Together
Workers’ compensation and a construction accident settlement serve different purposes.
Under California Labor Code section 3602, workers’ compensation is generally the exclusive remedy against an injured worker’s employer for an injury covered by the workers’ compensation system. That usually means an employee cannot bring a standard negligence lawsuit against the employer for the same workplace injury.
The analysis changes when another party contributed to the accident.
A construction site may involve a general contractor, property owner, subcontractors, equipment manufacturers, and other businesses. If someone other than your employer contributed to the injury through negligence or another legally recognized basis for liability, a separate civil claim may be available.
That claim can exist alongside a workers’ compensation case. The two claims must be coordinated, however, because the workers’ compensation carrier may have a lien or reimbursement interest in a third-party recovery.
The California Division of Workers’ Compensation provides information about the workers’ compensation system and related claims.
Understanding how the claims interact is important before accepting a settlement from either side.
Who Can Be Held Responsible for a Construction Accident
Construction projects often involve multiple companies performing different jobs at the same site. The fact that you were injured while working does not automatically mean your employer is the only party whose conduct should be examined.
Potentially responsible third parties can include:
- General contractors
- Property owners
- Subcontractors working for another company
- Equipment manufacturers
- Equipment suppliers
- Site managers or other entities that exercised control over the work
- Companies responsible for maintaining dangerous areas or equipment
The legal theory depends on what happened and which party had responsibility for the condition that caused the injury.
For example, a subcontractor from another company may create a dangerous condition that injures you. A defective piece of equipment may lead to a product liability claim. A property owner or contractor may also face liability in circumstances where California law recognizes a duty to the injured worker.
Construction accounted for a significant share of fatal workplace injuries nationwide in 2024, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. On a construction site, identifying every potentially responsible party can therefore be an important part of evaluating an injury claim.
The Privette Doctrine and Construction Injury Claims
California’s Privette doctrine can make third-party construction cases more complicated.
The doctrine generally protects a property owner or other hirer that hires an independent contractor from liability for injuries arising from the contractor’s work. The reasoning is that the contractor, rather than the hirer, ordinarily assumes responsibility for performing the work safely.
That protection is not absolute.
California courts have recognized circumstances in which a hirer may still face liability. One involves a hirer that retains control over the work and exercises that control in a way that contributes to the worker’s injury. This principle is associated with Hooker v. Department of Transportation.
Another involves concealed hazards that the hirer knows about but does not disclose to the contractor. This exception is associated with Kinsman v. Unocal Corp.
California law also recognizes circumstances involving injuries caused by the hirer’s own active conduct or work.
These rules are highly dependent on the facts. The identity of the party that controlled the work, what that party knew, what it did, and how those actions contributed to the accident can all affect whether a civil claim survives.
What a Construction Accident Settlement Can Cover
A third-party construction accident settlement can provide categories of compensation that are not available through workers’ compensation.
Depending on the claim and the evidence, damages may include:
- Past and future medical expenses
- Lost income
- Reduced future earning capacity
- Pain and suffering
- Emotional distress
- Costs associated with a permanent disability
- Necessary modifications to a home or vehicle
- Wrongful death damages in an eligible claim
Workers’ compensation operates under its own statutory benefit structure. A third-party civil claim is different because it can seek damages based on the losses caused by the responsible party’s conduct.
For a construction worker who can no longer perform the same trade, for example, the loss may involve more than the wages already missed. The injury may affect the person’s ability to earn income over many years. That potential loss should be evaluated as part of the civil claim when the evidence supports it.
Construction Accident Settlement Deadlines in California
Deadlines can affect both your workers’ compensation claim and any third-party lawsuit, but the rules are not identical.
Under California Labor Code section 5400, an employee generally must give written notice of an injury to the employer within 30 days of the date of injury. Failing to provide timely notice can create problems with a workers’ compensation claim, although California law provides exceptions in some circumstances.
A third-party personal injury lawsuit is generally subject to a two-year statute of limitations under California Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1. Other deadlines can apply depending on who caused the injury.
Claims involving a government entity require additional attention. California’s government claims procedures can impose a six-month deadline for presenting certain claims, rather than allowing an injured person to wait two years before taking action.
These deadlines can involve exceptions, different triggering dates, and additional procedural requirements. An injured construction worker should not assume that the same deadline applies to every claim arising from an accident.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I be fired for filing a workers’ compensation claim after a construction accident?
California law prohibits an employer from retaliating against an employee for exercising rights protected by the workers’ compensation system. If an employer reduces your hours, demotes you, terminates your employment, or takes another adverse action because you reported an injury or pursued workers’ compensation benefits, you may have a separate retaliation issue to address.
The facts and timing matter, so keep records of your injury report, workers’ compensation claim, communications with your employer, and any employment changes that follow.
What if I was partly at fault for my construction accident?
You may still be able to recover compensation.
California follows a pure comparative negligence system. If you are found partly responsible for an accident, your recovery can be reduced by your percentage of fault. Being partly responsible does not automatically eliminate a third-party claim.
For example, if a jury determines that you were 20% responsible for an accident and the third party was 80% responsible, your civil damages would generally be reduced by 20%.
The specific allocation of fault depends on the evidence.
Do I need a lawyer if I already have a workers’ compensation claim?
A workers’ compensation claim does not answer the separate question of whether another party may be legally responsible for your injury.
If a third-party claim exists, there may be additional damages available that workers’ compensation does not cover. There may also be a lien or reimbursement claim from the workers’ compensation carrier that must be addressed as part of the civil case.
Our construction accident attorneys can investigate the accident, identify potentially responsible parties, evaluate the available damages, and account for the interaction between the two claims.
What if my employer does not carry workers’ compensation insurance?
California employers are generally required to carry workers’ compensation insurance, subject to limited exceptions.
If your employer failed to maintain required coverage, the legal options can be different from those available when a valid workers’ compensation policy exists. California also operates the Uninsured Employers Benefits Trust Fund, which may provide workers’ compensation benefits to eligible employees injured while working for an uninsured employer.
An uninsured employer can also face additional legal consequences. Because the available remedies depend on the circumstances, an injured worker should have the situation evaluated promptly.
Easton & Easton for Construction Accident Claims
A construction injury can leave you dealing with workers’ compensation while also wondering whether another company or contractor may be responsible for what happened.
The first step is identifying every potential source of recovery and understanding how those claims fit together.
At Easton & Easton, our family of attorneys has more than three decades of experience representing injured people in Southern California. We investigate the companies involved in a construction project, examine how the accident occurred, and evaluate whether a third-party claim may provide compensation beyond workers’ compensation benefits.
Our attorneys can also examine issues involving contractors, equipment manufacturers, subcontractors, property owners, and the Privette doctrine when those issues are relevant to the case.
If you were injured in a construction accident, contact Easton & Easton to schedule a consultation and discuss the claims and potential sources of compensation available in your case.
ES